Middle Grades & Secondary Education: Faculty Publications
Response 1: Quantitative Reasoning in Stem Disciplines
Document Type
Contribution to Book
Publication Date
1-8-2016
Publication Title
Reconceptualizing STEM Education: The Central Role of Practices
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700328
ISBN
9781315700328
Abstract
This response provides brief comments on Quantitative Reasoning (QR) lead chapters ( Johnson, this volume; Petrosino, this volume), then offers comments on the Introduction (Duschl et al, this volume). My responses are guided by the research and development conducted through the Pathways Project 1 , an NSF supported initiative to develop environmental literacy learning progressions. The Pathways QR team led efforts to incorporate QR into the science learning progressions, culminating in the formation of a QR learning progression. Hence, the response is from the perspective of QR as defined in this project.
Recommended Citation
Mayes, Robert.
2016.
"Response 1: Quantitative Reasoning in Stem Disciplines."
Reconceptualizing STEM Education: The Central Role of Practices (1st), N. Lederman, Richard A. Duschl, and Amber S. Bismack (Ed.) New York: Routledge/Taylor Francis Group.
doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315700328 source: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/edit/10.4324/9781315700328/reconceptualizing-stem-education-richard-duschl-amber-bismack isbn: 9781315700328
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/teach-secondary-facpubs/42
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
