2020 Conference Archive
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
Conference Tracks
Assessment and SoTL - Research
Abstract
This project explores how faculty explicitly facilitate the development of critical thinking skills in a graduate level speech-language pathology program. Explicit instruction on critical thinking in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) curricula have been identified as necessary (Finn, Brundage, & DiLollo, 2016). Between pre- and post-tests, the author engaged students in critical thinking activities, explicitly describing them, following up with reflection using Bloom’s Taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). Outcomes data are currently under review. Group comparisons will be conducted via paired sample t-tests. Four themes emerged related to evidence-based practice.
Session Format
Poster
1
Location
Harborside Ballroom East
Publication Type and Release Option
Event
Recommended Citation
Battaglia, Dana, "Facilitating Critical Thinking in Graduate Coursework in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Process Review" (2020). SoTL Commons Conference. 88.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sotlcommons/SoTL/2020/88
Facilitating Critical Thinking in Graduate Coursework in Communication Sciences and Disorders: Process Review
Harborside Ballroom East
This project explores how faculty explicitly facilitate the development of critical thinking skills in a graduate level speech-language pathology program. Explicit instruction on critical thinking in Communication Sciences and Disorders (CSD) curricula have been identified as necessary (Finn, Brundage, & DiLollo, 2016). Between pre- and post-tests, the author engaged students in critical thinking activities, explicitly describing them, following up with reflection using Bloom’s Taxonomy (Anderson & Krathwohl, 2001). Outcomes data are currently under review. Group comparisons will be conducted via paired sample t-tests. Four themes emerged related to evidence-based practice.
