Location

Morgan

Session Format

Presentation

Abstract

Should we teach handwriting during elementary school? This complex activity is

debated and left out of some elementary school curriculums. Babarro & Perez

Lopez (2022) provide evidence explaining handwriting should be taught in

elementary school using a meta-analysis and meta-synthesis of research from

2000 to 2020. The authors selected 31 studies including 2,030 students in grades

kindergarten through 6. When compared to no instruction different handwriting

interventions yielded a 0.64 effect size. Strategies used to improve handwriting

fluency provided a 0.49 effect size. Hemphill (2003) supplied quantitatively based

guidelines from two meta-analyses to explain an effect size of .30 and above to be

large. Graham & Herbert (2011), show evidence in a meta-analysis detailing how

writing facilitates reading with several effect sizes in excess of 1.0. While digital

tools are used in elementary school paper and pen (or pencil) are still commonly

used and also in everyday life activities outside school. (Santangelo & Graham,

2016). The significance of these findings and implications for future elementary

school instruction and research will be discussed.

Keywords

handwriting, reading and writing connections

Professional Bio

Regular and Special Education Teacher - 1968-1991 Faculty Member Armstrong State University/Georgia Southern University 1991-Present (Professor) Elementary and Special Education Chair, Armstrong State University/Georgia Southern University 2008-2019

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Share

COinS
 
Feb 2nd, 8:45 AM Feb 2nd, 10:15 AM

Should We Teach Handwriting in Elementary School? A Meta-Analysis

Morgan

Should we teach handwriting during elementary school? This complex activity is

debated and left out of some elementary school curriculums. Babarro & Perez

Lopez (2022) provide evidence explaining handwriting should be taught in

elementary school using a meta-analysis and meta-synthesis of research from

2000 to 2020. The authors selected 31 studies including 2,030 students in grades

kindergarten through 6. When compared to no instruction different handwriting

interventions yielded a 0.64 effect size. Strategies used to improve handwriting

fluency provided a 0.49 effect size. Hemphill (2003) supplied quantitatively based

guidelines from two meta-analyses to explain an effect size of .30 and above to be

large. Graham & Herbert (2011), show evidence in a meta-analysis detailing how

writing facilitates reading with several effect sizes in excess of 1.0. While digital

tools are used in elementary school paper and pen (or pencil) are still commonly

used and also in everyday life activities outside school. (Santangelo & Graham,

2016). The significance of these findings and implications for future elementary

school instruction and research will be discussed.