Using The Problem Analysis Triangle to Prevent Bullying

Format

Individual Presentation

First Presenter's Institution

Georgia Southern University

First Presenter’s Email Address

ericlanders@georgiasouthern.edu

First Presenter's Brief Biography

Dr. Eric Landers earned his Ph.D. from the University of Florida with an emphasis on children with Emotional and Behavioral Disorders (EBD). He has worked as a classroom teacher for students with EBD, a professor at West Virginia University and Georgia Southern University, and as an independent consultant for supporting school improvement initiatives. Dr. Landers focus is in the areas of bullying, responding to challenging behaviors, teacher job satisfaction, and school-wide PBIS. He has served as the Co-Director of the BSED, MAT, and MED Special Education Programs at Georgia Southern University and the founder/director of the Southeast Conference on School Climate.

Location

Session Four

Strand #1

Hands: Safety & Violence Prevention

Strand #2

Heart: Social & Emotional Skills

Relevance

This presentation addresses how to identify and prevent bullying in schools. It is directly related to the "safety and violence" strand of the conference.

Brief Program Description

This presentation discusses the Problem Analysis Triangle to prevent bullying in schools. Bullying impacts school personnel in terms of time, effort, and even money. Participants will learn how the bully, the victim, and the opportunity work together to create the bullying situation. Participants will also learn how to strengthen different support already present in their schools to predict bullying better, protect the victims, and address the bully when the behavior has occurred.

Summary

Nearly 20% of students report being bullied in schools in the past 12 months. Bullying behavior can negatively impact students in a variety of ways, including attendance (e.g., Berthold & Hoover, 2000), adverse physical health (e.g., Bogart et al., 2014), and increased depression (Cook et al., 2010). In addition to the negative impact of bullying on students, instances of bullying take time to investigate and can even produce a monetary cost to schools (Baams et al., 2017). Addressing this system-wide problem in an effective, efficient manner cannot only protect students from further harm but also save school personnel time and money. This presentation focuses on the Problem Analysis Triangle as an approach to analyzing and addressing school bullying. Derived from the routine activity approach (Cohen & Felson, 1979), the Problem Analysis Triangle recognizes that there are three interconnected factors in a bullying situation: the offender (bully), the target (victim), and the opportunity. The theory considers that all three factors are necessary for a bullying situation to occur. If school

personnel can work to control only one of these factors, the instances of bullying in schools can be reduced. In addition, the Problem Analysis Triangle considers another layer to the problem. There are influencers in each of the parts of the triangle. The handler influences the offender. The victim and the opportunity are protected by the guardian and the manager, respectively. Each of these influencers can either hinder the extent of the problem in a school or fail to control it. This presentation will discuss how each of the sides of the triangle (bully, victim, and opportunity) influence each other in the bullying process and offers practical school-ready solutions for school personnel. Participants will also learn how to strengthen the roles of “handlers” to remediate bullying behavior, “managers” to better predict and prevent bullying in specific locations, and “guardians” to provide support for victims.

Evidence

Armitage, R. (2021). Bullying in children: Impact on child health. BMJ Paediatrics Open, (5). http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000939

Baams, L., Talmage, C., & Russell, S. (2017). Economic costs of bias-based bullying. School Psychology Quarterly, 32(3), 422-433. https://doi.org/10.1037/spq0000211

Bauman, S., & Del Rio, A. (2006). Preservice teachers’ responses to bullying scenarios: Comparing physical, verbal, and relational bullying. Journal of Educational Psychology, (98)1, 219-231. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.1.219

Bell, J., & Willis, G. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of bullying among youth. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 159-168. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.931833

Bogart, L., Elliott, M., Klein, D., Tortolero, S, Mrug, S., Peskin, M., Davies, S., Schink, E., & Schuster, M. (2014). Peer victimization in fifth grade and health in tenth grade. Pediatrics, 133(3), 440-447. https://doi.org/10.1542%2Fpeds.2013-3510

Bradshaw, C, Waasdorp, T., & O’Brennan, L. (2013). Teachers’ and education support professionals’ perspectives on bullying and prevention: Findings from a National Education Association study. School Psychology Review, 42(3), 280-297. https://doi.org/10.1080/02796015.2013.12087474

Boulton, M. (1997). Teachers’ view on bullying: Definitions, attitudes, and ability to cope. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67 (2), 223-233. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1997.tb01239.x

Byers, D. L., Caltabiano, N. J., & Caltabiano, M. L. (2011). Teachers' attitudes towards overt and covert bullying, and perceived efficacy to intervene. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(11). 105-119. http://dx.doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n11.1

Campbell, M., Spears, B., Slee, P., Butler, D., & Kift, S. (2012). Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their victimization. Emotional & Behavioural Difficulties, 17(3-4), 389–401. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13632752.2012.704316

Campbell, M., Whiteford, C., & Hooijer, J. (2019). Teachers’ and parents' understanding of traditional and cyberbullying. Journal of School Violence, 18(3), 388-402. https://doi.org/10.1080/15388220.2018.1507826

Canty, J., Stubbet, M., Steers, D., & Collings, S. (2016). The trouble with bullying-Deconstructing the conventional definition of bullying for a child-centered investigation into children’s use of social media. Children & Society, 30(1), 48-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/chso.12103

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Bullying surveillance among youths: Uniform definitions for public health and recommended data elements, Version 1.0. https://www.cdc.gov/violenceprevention/pdf/Bullying-Definitions-FINAL-a.pdf

Chang, V. (2021). Inconsistent definitions of bullying: A need to examine people’s judgment and reasoning about bullying and cyberbullying. Human Development, 65 (3), 144-159. https://doi.org/10.1159/000516838

Cheng, Y., Chen, L., Ho, H., Cheng, C. (2011). Definitions of school bullying in Taiwan: A comparison of multiple perspectives. School Psychology International (32)3, 277-243. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143034311404130

Chester, K., Spencer, N., Whiting, L., & Brooks, F. (2017). Association between experiencing relational bullying and adolescent health-related quality of life. Journal of School Health, 87(11), 865-872. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/josh.12558

Cohen, J., & Espelage, D. L. (2020). Feeling safe in school: Bullying and violence prevention around the world. Harvard Education Press.

Copeland, W., Wolke, D., Angold, A., & Costello, J. (2013). Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adolescence. JAMA, 70(4), 419-426. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2013.504

Ey, L., & Campbell, M. (2021). Australian early childhood teachers’ understanding of bullying. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(15-15), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.1177/08862605211006355

Faris, R., Felmlee, D., & McMillan, C. (2020). With friends like these: Aggression from amity and equivalence. American Journal of Sociology, 126(3), 673-713. https://doi.org/10.1086/712972

Farrington, D. & Ttofi, M. (2011). Bullying as a predictor of offending, violence, and later life outcomes. Criminal Behavior and Mental Health, 21(2), 90-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cbm.801

Gruber, J., & Fineran, S. (2008). Comparing the impact of bullying and sexual harassment victimization on the mental and physical health of adolescents. Sex Roles, 59, 1-13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11199-008-9431-5

Haynie, D., Nansel, T., Eitel, P., Crump, A., Saylor, K., Yu, K., & Simons-Morton, B. (2001). Bullies, victims, and bully/victims: Distinct groups of at-risk youth. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 21(1), 29-49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0272431601021001002

Hutzell, K., & Payne, A. (2012). The impact of bullying victimization on school avoidance. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 10(4), 370-385. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1541204012438926

Irwin, V., Wang, K., Cui, J., Zhang, J., and Thompson, A. (2021). Report on Indicators of School Crime and Safety: 2020 (NCES 2021-092/NCJ 300772). National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education, and Bureau of Justice Statistics, Office of Justice Programs, U.S. Department of Justice. Washington, DC. Retrieved 12/16/2022 from https:// nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2021092.

Hornby, G (2016). Bullying: An ecological approach to intervention in schools. Preventing School Failure, 60(3), 222-230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2015.1086969

Hughes, T. (1913). Tom Brown’s schooldays. London: Charles H. Kelly. As cited in Koo, H (2007). A timeline of the evaluation of school bullying in differing social contexts. Asian Pacific Education Review, 8(1), 107-116. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03025837

Jones, J. & Augustine, S. (2015). Creating an anti-bullying culture in secondary schools: Characteristics to consider when constructing appropriate anti-bullying programs. American Secondary Education, 43(3), 73-84.

Landis). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33(1), 159-174. https://doi.org/10.2307/2529310

Migliaccio, T. (2015). Teacher engagement with bullying: Managing an identity within a school. Sociological Spectrum, 35(1), 84-108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2014.978430

Mishna, F, Scarello, I, Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2005). Teachers’ understanding of bullying. Canadian Journal of Education, 28(4), 718-738. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4126452

Mishna, F., Pepler, D., & Wiener, J. (2006). Factors associated with perceptions and responses to bullying situations by children, parents, teachers, and principals. Victims and Offenders, 1(3), 255-288. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15564880600626163

Moreno, M., Suthamjariya, N., & Selkie, E. (2018). Stakeholders’ perceptions of cyberbullying cases: Application of the uniform definition of bullying. Journal of Adolescent Health, 62(4), 444-449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2017.11.289

Naylor, P., Cowie, H., Cossin, F., Bettencourt, R., & Lemme, F. (2006). Teachers’ and pupils’ definition of bullying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(3), 553-576. https://doi.org/10.1348/000709905x52229

Nelson, H. J., Kendall, G. E., Burns, S. K., Schonert-Reichl, K. A., & Kane, R. T. (2019). Measuring 8 to 12 year old children’s self-report of power imbalance in relation to bullying: Development of the Scale of Perceived Power Imbalance. BMC Public Health, 19, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-019-7375-z

Nishioka, V., Coe, M., Burke, A., Hanita, M., and Sprague, J. (2011). Student-reported overt and relational aggression and victimization in grades 3–8. (Issues & Answers Report, REL 2011–No. 114). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Regional Educational Laboratory Northwest. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/edlabs.

Olweus, D. (1978). Aggression in the schools: Bullies and whipping boys. Hemisphere Publishing Corp.

Olweus, D. (1993). Bullying at school: What we know and what we can do. Maiden, MA: Wiley—Blackwell.

Paluck, E. L., Shepherd, H., & Aronow, P. M. (2016). Changing climates of conflict: A social network experiment in 56 schools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(3), 566-571. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1514483113

Rigby, K. (2020). Do teachers really underestimate the prevalence of bullying in schools? Social Psychology of Education, 23, 963-978. http://doi:10.1007/s11218-020-09564-0

Saldana, Johnny (2009). The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.

Slattery, L., George, H., Kern, L. (2019). Defining the word bullying: Inconsistencies and lack of clarity among current definitions. Preventing School Failure, 63(3), 227-235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1045988X.2019.1579164

Volk, A. A., Dane, A. V., & Marini, Z. A. (2014). What is bullying? A theoretical redefinition. Developmental Review, 34, 327–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2014.09.001

Wang, J., Iannotti, R., & Nansel, T. (2009). School bullying among US adolescents: Physical, verbal, relational and cyber. Journal for Adolescent Health, 45(4), 368-375. https://doi.org/10.1016%2Fj.jadohealth.2009.03.021

Williford, A., DePaolis, K., & Colonnieves, K. (2021). Differences in school staff attitudes, perceptions, self-efficacy beliefs, and interventions likelihood by form of student victimization. Journal of the Society for Social Work and Research, 12(1), 83-107. https://doi.org/10.1086/713360

Woolley, R. (2019). Towards an inclusive understanding of bullying: Identifying conceptions and practices in the primary school workforce. Educational Review, 71(6), 730-747. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1471666

Learning Objective 1

Participants will complete this session with system-level strategies to prevent bullying at multiple age levels.

Learning Objective 2

Participants will learn how to target data for problem identification, organize personnel to maximize prevention and disseminate school-ready activities to address bullying throughout their systems.

Learning Objective 3

Participants will learn strategies to address the bully, the victims and the context to prevent bullying.

Keyword Descriptors

Bullying

Presentation Year

2024

Start Date

3-5-2024 8:30 AM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Mar 5th, 8:30 AM

Using The Problem Analysis Triangle to Prevent Bullying

Session Four

This presentation discusses the Problem Analysis Triangle to prevent bullying in schools. Bullying impacts school personnel in terms of time, effort, and even money. Participants will learn how the bully, the victim, and the opportunity work together to create the bullying situation. Participants will also learn how to strengthen different support already present in their schools to predict bullying better, protect the victims, and address the bully when the behavior has occurred.