Session Information
Other (please specify below)
Abstract of proposed session
This session will report the findings of a study that explored the beginning transformations in the pedagogical philosophies and practices of three mathematics teachers (middle, high school, and 2-year college) who completed a graduate-level mathematics education course that focused on critical theory and teaching for social justice, and how these transformations are compatible (or not) with reform mathematics education as suggested by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), and in turn, the new Georgia Performance Standards (GPS). The study employed Freirian participatory research methodology; in fact, the participants were not only co- researchers, but also co-authors of the study. Data collection included reflective essays, journals, and “storytelling”; data analysis was a combination of textual analysis and autoethnography. The findings report that the teachers believed that the course provided not only a new language but also a legitimization to transform their pedagogical philosophies and practices away from the “traditional” and toward a mathematics for social justice—a mathematics that is, indeed, compatible with the reform movements of the NCTM and GPS.
Keywords
Mathematics teachers, Critical theory, Teaching for social justice, National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Georgia Performance Standards, Education reform
Recommended Citation
Stinson, David W.; Bidwell, Carla R.; Powell, Ginny C.; and Thurman, Mary M., "Paper 1: Becoming Critical Mathematics Pedagogues: A Journey" (2008). Georgia Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (GAMTE) Annual Conference. 2.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gamte/2008/proceedings/2
Included in
Science and Mathematics Education Commons, Teacher Education and Professional Development Commons
Paper 1: Becoming Critical Mathematics Pedagogues: A Journey
This session will report the findings of a study that explored the beginning transformations in the pedagogical philosophies and practices of three mathematics teachers (middle, high school, and 2-year college) who completed a graduate-level mathematics education course that focused on critical theory and teaching for social justice, and how these transformations are compatible (or not) with reform mathematics education as suggested by the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM), and in turn, the new Georgia Performance Standards (GPS). The study employed Freirian participatory research methodology; in fact, the participants were not only co- researchers, but also co-authors of the study. Data collection included reflective essays, journals, and “storytelling”; data analysis was a combination of textual analysis and autoethnography. The findings report that the teachers believed that the course provided not only a new language but also a legitimization to transform their pedagogical philosophies and practices away from the “traditional” and toward a mathematics for social justice—a mathematics that is, indeed, compatible with the reform movements of the NCTM and GPS.
