Penality, Power and Polity: Exploring the Relationship between Political Repression and Corporal Punishment
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
12-2011
Publication Title
International Criminal Justice Review
DOI
10.1177/1057567711431126
ISSN
1556-3855
Abstract
Worldwide, the punishment of law violators takes many forms, with some countries relying heavily on incarceration and others favoring a mix of punishments including incarceration, corporal punishment, and the death penalty. Determining why a nation chooses to implement one sanction over another requires an examination of political factors. While some notable research has examined the correlations between incarceration rates, death penalty retention, and various measures of political power and repression, the influence of political factors on punishment needs a fuller explication. Specifically, the use of corporal punishment as a criminal sanction has not been fully examined within the political repression and punishment literature. To address this gap, authors employ a cross-national comparative approach to examine how repressive governments and failing regimes influence the use of corporal punishment by the formal justice system. Findings reveal that more repressive and failing regimes are more likely to use corporal punishment, compared to freer and more sustainable nations.
Recommended Citation
Gould, Laurie A., Matthew Pate.
2011.
"Penality, Power and Polity: Exploring the Relationship between Political Repression and Corporal Punishment."
International Criminal Justice Review, 21 (4): 443-461 Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
doi: 10.1177/1057567711431126
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/crimjust-criminology-facpubs/56
Copyright
Copyright belongs to SAGE. Information regarding the dissemination and usage of journal articles can be accessed through the following links.