2017 Conference Archive
Observed Cheating and the Effects of Random Seat Assignment
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
Track
Research Proposal / Assessment of Student Learning
Abstract
Using a multiple choice exam design that allows us to empirically measure the degree to which students copy answers from their peers, we conduct an experiment to determine whether random seat assignment deters cheating relative to a control group of students allowed to choose their seats. Our results demonstrate a significant decline in measured cheating within the assigned seating sample. This study contributes to the literature by providing a measurement of actual cheating frequency among students, as opposed to relying on reported cheating in anonymous surveys, and by demonstrating that an easily implemented deterrent can significantly reduce instances of cheating.
Session Format
Presentation Session
Location
Room 5
Publication Type and Release Option
Event
Recommended Citation
Yates, Michael C.; Godbey, Jonathan; and Fendler, Richard, "Observed Cheating and the Effects of Random Seat Assignment" (2017). SoTL Commons Conference. 69.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sotlcommons/SoTL/2017/69
Observed Cheating and the Effects of Random Seat Assignment
Room 5
Using a multiple choice exam design that allows us to empirically measure the degree to which students copy answers from their peers, we conduct an experiment to determine whether random seat assignment deters cheating relative to a control group of students allowed to choose their seats. Our results demonstrate a significant decline in measured cheating within the assigned seating sample. This study contributes to the literature by providing a measurement of actual cheating frequency among students, as opposed to relying on reported cheating in anonymous surveys, and by demonstrating that an easily implemented deterrent can significantly reduce instances of cheating.
