2015 Conference Archive

Do Assignments Improve Honors Student Perceptions of Addressing Poverty?

Copyright

This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.

Conference Tracks

Academic/ Professional Development - Research

Abstract

This research identifies differences in student perceptions in addressing poverty when assigned to an intervention group versus a control group. Both the intervention group (n=39) and control group (n=54) were enrolled in one-hour Honors sections of a transition course at a four-year public institution. The assigned text for the course was Soul of a Citizen by Paul Rogat Loeb, which emphasizes social engagement. Students were assigned select readings and time was spent discussing the text. Students attended a presentation about a local safety net non-profit organization and were informed about volunteer opportunities. The intervention group completed three assignments related to poverty whereas the control group did not. Both groups completed a survey near the beginning and end of the course to examine perceptions of poverty, including how effective students could be at addressing it (range = 1 very ineffective to 5 very effective). Researchers will share the results of a paired t-test from pre-to-post survey for both groups to show whether there were statistically significant differences during the course. Researchers will share Pearson chi-square test results that showed whether there were statistically significant differences in perceptions at post-measure between the two groups. Further statistical analyses results will also be shared.

Session Format

Presentation

Location

Rooms 113 & 115

Publication Type and Release Option

Image (Open Access)

Share

COinS
 
Mar 25th, 5:00 PM Mar 25th, 6:00 PM

Do Assignments Improve Honors Student Perceptions of Addressing Poverty?

Rooms 113 & 115

This research identifies differences in student perceptions in addressing poverty when assigned to an intervention group versus a control group. Both the intervention group (n=39) and control group (n=54) were enrolled in one-hour Honors sections of a transition course at a four-year public institution. The assigned text for the course was Soul of a Citizen by Paul Rogat Loeb, which emphasizes social engagement. Students were assigned select readings and time was spent discussing the text. Students attended a presentation about a local safety net non-profit organization and were informed about volunteer opportunities. The intervention group completed three assignments related to poverty whereas the control group did not. Both groups completed a survey near the beginning and end of the course to examine perceptions of poverty, including how effective students could be at addressing it (range = 1 very ineffective to 5 very effective). Researchers will share the results of a paired t-test from pre-to-post survey for both groups to show whether there were statistically significant differences during the course. Researchers will share Pearson chi-square test results that showed whether there were statistically significant differences in perceptions at post-measure between the two groups. Further statistical analyses results will also be shared.