2013 Conference Archive

Teaching and Learning the Apocalypse: A First-Year Seminar Study

Copyright

This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.

Abstract

Two faculty in English and Speech Communication, along with two of their students, will describe their seminar "Reading and Writing the Apocalypse,” overviewing pedagogy with evidence-based examples of student essays. Our talk explores how some fundamentalists enforce identity around the threat of end times, a rhetorical method for securing adherence to group values. Rhetors typically work within such identifications to foster more tolerant beliefs. However, as Sharon Crowley writes in Toward a Civil Discourse, “it is hard to imagine… counter[ing] those who take [their values as] universal and nonnegotiable” (200). The U.S. tolerates pre-millennial beliefs, though rising fears of apocalypse polarize public discourse. Among other topics, students debate such identifications through deliberative ethics, research, and persuasive writing. Learning outcomes: 1) to help faculty design interdisciplinary seminars with scholar/ teacher research; 2) to share evidence/results; 3) to connect with other faculty/institutions interested in the scholarship of learning focused on the apocalypse.

Location

Room 1005

Publication Type and Release Option

Event

Share

COinS
 
Mar 28th, 3:00 PM Mar 27th, 3:45 PM

Teaching and Learning the Apocalypse: A First-Year Seminar Study

Room 1005

Two faculty in English and Speech Communication, along with two of their students, will describe their seminar "Reading and Writing the Apocalypse,” overviewing pedagogy with evidence-based examples of student essays. Our talk explores how some fundamentalists enforce identity around the threat of end times, a rhetorical method for securing adherence to group values. Rhetors typically work within such identifications to foster more tolerant beliefs. However, as Sharon Crowley writes in Toward a Civil Discourse, “it is hard to imagine… counter[ing] those who take [their values as] universal and nonnegotiable” (200). The U.S. tolerates pre-millennial beliefs, though rising fears of apocalypse polarize public discourse. Among other topics, students debate such identifications through deliberative ethics, research, and persuasive writing. Learning outcomes: 1) to help faculty design interdisciplinary seminars with scholar/ teacher research; 2) to share evidence/results; 3) to connect with other faculty/institutions interested in the scholarship of learning focused on the apocalypse.