2012 Conference Archive
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
Abstract
Limitations in previous pseudo-experimentally designed Scholarship of Teaching and Learning studies were addressed by including recent recommendations in the literature (LoSchiavo, Shatz, & Poling, 2008; Smith, 2008). These involved: (a) pre/post tests administered in Social Psychology (SP) courses; (b) random assignment of SP students within the same course, semester, and instructor to one of the two interventions; and (c) the recruitment of students from a participant pool to serve as a group control (i.e., completed the same tests without having taken the course). This presentation focused on results from a 50-items SP exam covering SP topics, including prejudice, aggression, attraction and helping behavior. Students' scores were compared between those randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups (n = 35) or to a control group (n = 44). Students in the experimental conditions performed significantly higher on exam than in the control (M = 38.37, SD = 4.94 vs. M = 23.50, SD = 6.34); F(1, 77) = 129.72, p < .001, Partial Eta Squared = .63. Implications of results are discussed.
Location
Atrium/Concourse
Publication Type and Release Option
Event
Recommended Citation
Marsh, Patricia; Gopala, Neena; and Dickherber, Anna, "Improving the Experimental Design of SoTL Research" (2012). SoTL Commons Conference. 57.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sotlcommons/SoTL/2012/57
Improving the Experimental Design of SoTL Research
Atrium/Concourse
Limitations in previous pseudo-experimentally designed Scholarship of Teaching and Learning studies were addressed by including recent recommendations in the literature (LoSchiavo, Shatz, & Poling, 2008; Smith, 2008). These involved: (a) pre/post tests administered in Social Psychology (SP) courses; (b) random assignment of SP students within the same course, semester, and instructor to one of the two interventions; and (c) the recruitment of students from a participant pool to serve as a group control (i.e., completed the same tests without having taken the course). This presentation focused on results from a 50-items SP exam covering SP topics, including prejudice, aggression, attraction and helping behavior. Students' scores were compared between those randomly assigned to one of two experimental groups (n = 35) or to a control group (n = 44). Students in the experimental conditions performed significantly higher on exam than in the control (M = 38.37, SD = 4.94 vs. M = 23.50, SD = 6.34); F(1, 77) = 129.72, p < .001, Partial Eta Squared = .63. Implications of results are discussed.
