2010 Conference Archive

An Investigative and Cooperative Learning Approach to the General Chemistry Laboratory

Copyright

This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.

Abstract

A semester-long investigative and cooperative learning strategies have been introduced in the General Chemistry laboratory to enhance student learning and engagement; involving literature revision, method development, data analysis, and oral and written presentation. The experience was implemented in two laboratory sections, covering a total of 33 students. Different roles were assigned to these students: facilitator/encourager, timekeeper, summarizer, reflector, elaborator, and presenter. To evaluate the experience, students completed a survey and evaluated their peers and themselves with a rubric. The instructor evaluated a written report and an oral presentation. The “anti acid group” accomplished an improvement of 10% in the oral presentation and also reported better teamwork, 14% of improvement, compared to the “iron in vitamin group”. After this research experience, the “anti acid” students have shown greater interest in joining a research group in their respective faculty, demonstrating that this research experience affected them in a very positive way.

Location

Concourse

Publication Type and Release Option

Event

Share

COinS
 
Mar 11th, 4:00 PM Mar 11th, 5:15 PM

An Investigative and Cooperative Learning Approach to the General Chemistry Laboratory

Concourse

A semester-long investigative and cooperative learning strategies have been introduced in the General Chemistry laboratory to enhance student learning and engagement; involving literature revision, method development, data analysis, and oral and written presentation. The experience was implemented in two laboratory sections, covering a total of 33 students. Different roles were assigned to these students: facilitator/encourager, timekeeper, summarizer, reflector, elaborator, and presenter. To evaluate the experience, students completed a survey and evaluated their peers and themselves with a rubric. The instructor evaluated a written report and an oral presentation. The “anti acid group” accomplished an improvement of 10% in the oral presentation and also reported better teamwork, 14% of improvement, compared to the “iron in vitamin group”. After this research experience, the “anti acid” students have shown greater interest in joining a research group in their respective faculty, demonstrating that this research experience affected them in a very positive way.