Effects of Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training on the Strength of the Shoulder Internal and External Rotators in Physically Active Healthy Subjects

Location

Presentation 1 (Learning Commons- Studio M)

Session Format

Oral Presentation

Your Campus

Armstrong Campus- Learning Commons, April 19th

Academic Unit

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences

Research Area Topic:

Exercise Science & Human Performance - Exercise Science

Co-Presenters and Faculty Mentors or Advisors

Alexandra Perry, SPT

Joshua King, SPT

J. Caleb Fields, SPT

Kelsey Lewis, SPT, MS

George J. Davies, DPT, Rehabilitation Sciences

Bryan L. Riemann, Ph.D., Health Science Kinesiology

Abstract

Background:

There are over 2800 articles on blood flow restriction (BFR) in PubMed; only 11 include the shoulder.

Purpose:

The purpose was to determine effects of BFR training on the strength of shoulder internal (IR) and external rotators (ER). We hypothesized both control (C) and experimental (E) groups would significantly improve in shoulder strength. Subjects in E (BFR) would show significantly more improvement than C. C will have non significant gains in contralateral extremity. E will significantly increase strength in contralateral extremity.

Methods:

Subjects completed informed consent, PAR-Q, and demographic forms. Subjects were randomized into C and E groups. All subjects were pre and post tested with a Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) by blinded assessor with ICC reliability = 0.830. Subjects performed warm-up, trained with TheraBand using 4 sets x 30/15/15/15 reps x 60-80% OMNI-RES scale, 2x week for 6 weeks using shoulder IR/ER. The E group used BFR with 50% limb occlusion pressure (LOP).

Results:

Paired samples t-test concluded there were significant differences between pre and post testing within C (p=0.001) and E groups (p=0.001-0.006) for both IR/ER of D/ND. There were no significant differences between C and E groups (p=0.327-0.965). Both groups had significant improvement in untrained arm (p=0.000-0.006).

Conclusion/Outcomes:

The results did not support all of the hypotheses. The results of this study demonstrate that BFR can be applied to selected subjects to create an improvement in their strength.

Program Description

Determine effects of BFR training on shoulder strength of internal and external rotators. We hypothesized control (C) and experimental (E) groups would significantly improve. Subjects in E (BFR) would significantly improve more than C. C will have non-significant gains in contralateral extremity. E will significantly increase strength in contralateral extremity.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Presentation Type and Release Option

Presentation (Open Access)

Start Date

4-19-2022 10:30 AM

End Date

4-19-2022 11:30 AM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 19th, 10:30 AM Apr 19th, 11:30 AM

Effects of Blood Flow Restriction (BFR) Training on the Strength of the Shoulder Internal and External Rotators in Physically Active Healthy Subjects

Presentation 1 (Learning Commons- Studio M)

Background:

There are over 2800 articles on blood flow restriction (BFR) in PubMed; only 11 include the shoulder.

Purpose:

The purpose was to determine effects of BFR training on the strength of shoulder internal (IR) and external rotators (ER). We hypothesized both control (C) and experimental (E) groups would significantly improve in shoulder strength. Subjects in E (BFR) would show significantly more improvement than C. C will have non significant gains in contralateral extremity. E will significantly increase strength in contralateral extremity.

Methods:

Subjects completed informed consent, PAR-Q, and demographic forms. Subjects were randomized into C and E groups. All subjects were pre and post tested with a Hand Held Dynamometer (HHD) by blinded assessor with ICC reliability = 0.830. Subjects performed warm-up, trained with TheraBand using 4 sets x 30/15/15/15 reps x 60-80% OMNI-RES scale, 2x week for 6 weeks using shoulder IR/ER. The E group used BFR with 50% limb occlusion pressure (LOP).

Results:

Paired samples t-test concluded there were significant differences between pre and post testing within C (p=0.001) and E groups (p=0.001-0.006) for both IR/ER of D/ND. There were no significant differences between C and E groups (p=0.327-0.965). Both groups had significant improvement in untrained arm (p=0.000-0.006).

Conclusion/Outcomes:

The results did not support all of the hypotheses. The results of this study demonstrate that BFR can be applied to selected subjects to create an improvement in their strength.