Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
1-2010
Publication Title
Journal of Politics
DOI
10.1017/S0022381609990491
ISSN
0022-3816
Abstract
In the past two decades, numerous studies have tested empirically the normative theory of descriptive race representation. Here, we focus specifically on one aspect of descriptive representation—the relationship between increased racial representation and institutional legitimacy. Does greater racial diversity within a political institution increase its reservoir of good will? Using a novel experimental design centered on the federal courts, we find that greater descriptive representation for blacks causes increased legitimacy for the institution among African Americans. However, we also find that white support declines under the same experimental condition. In probing our data further, we discover that increased diversity does not impact blacks and whites in the same manner across the ideological spectrum. Rather, a person's ideology mediates how he or she assesses racial diversity on the bench. We conclude by discussing the implications of our findings.
Recommended Citation
Scherer, Nancy, Brett W. Curry.
2010.
"Does Descriptive Race Representation Enhance Institutional Legitimacy? The Case of the U.S. Courts."
Journal of Politics, 72 (1): 90-104: University of Chicago Press.
doi: 10.1017/S0022381609990491 source: https://www.journals.uchicago.edu/doi/full/10.1017/S0022381609990491
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/poli-sci-facpubs/127