Analysis of Preservice Middle-grades Mathematics Teachers’ Proof Writing

Location

Session 2 Presentations - Mathematics Education

Proposal Track

Research Project

Session Format

Presentation

Abstract

Reasoning and proof play a key role in school and college mathematics education. Previous studies have shown a lack of consistent exposure in preservice middle-grades mathematics teachers’ (PMMTs’) learning of formal proof writing. This lack of exposure can lead to inadequacies in the understanding and use of proof techniques and a possible failure to identify the importance of proof in mathematics in general. Some common problems in PMMTs’ proof writing are using empirically justified reasoning instead of deductive reasoning techniques and misunderstanding the logic of theorems by starting the proof from a false hypothesis. However, there is not much literature that addresses detailed analysis of the errors in PMMTs’ writing of formal proofs. The purpose of this study is to examine the errors in PMMTs’ proof writing in the context of a college geometry course for PMMTs and analyze the underlying misconceptions. Findings are expected to advance our knowledge of PMMTs’ conceptions of reasoning and proof and provide suggestions on possible improvements in PMMT preparation programs. Preliminary findings will be shared at our presentation.

Keywords

reasoning and proof, geometry, preservice middle-grades mathematics teachers

Professional Bio

Dr. Tuyin An is an Assistant Professor of Mathematics Education at Georgia Southern University (GS). She is interested in teaching and learning of mathematical reasoning and proof and pre-service mathematics teachers’ content knowledge. She is a Service, Teaching, and Research (STaR) Fellow in the Association of Mathematics Teacher Educators (AMTE), a Project NExT (New Experiences in Teaching) Fellow in the Mathematical Association of America (MAA), and a Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (SoTL) Fellow at GS. She earned her M.A. in Mathematics Education from New York University and Ph.D. in Mathematics Education from Purdue University.

Creative Commons License

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Oct 8th, 9:45 AM Oct 8th, 10:55 AM

Analysis of Preservice Middle-grades Mathematics Teachers’ Proof Writing

Session 2 Presentations - Mathematics Education

Reasoning and proof play a key role in school and college mathematics education. Previous studies have shown a lack of consistent exposure in preservice middle-grades mathematics teachers’ (PMMTs’) learning of formal proof writing. This lack of exposure can lead to inadequacies in the understanding and use of proof techniques and a possible failure to identify the importance of proof in mathematics in general. Some common problems in PMMTs’ proof writing are using empirically justified reasoning instead of deductive reasoning techniques and misunderstanding the logic of theorems by starting the proof from a false hypothesis. However, there is not much literature that addresses detailed analysis of the errors in PMMTs’ writing of formal proofs. The purpose of this study is to examine the errors in PMMTs’ proof writing in the context of a college geometry course for PMMTs and analyze the underlying misconceptions. Findings are expected to advance our knowledge of PMMTs’ conceptions of reasoning and proof and provide suggestions on possible improvements in PMMT preparation programs. Preliminary findings will be shared at our presentation.