Same Song, Different Choir

Location

Room 211

Proposal Track

Practice Report

Session Format

Round Table

Abstract

The CAPE standards have led to more precise, outcomes based expectations. However, the standards may have an adverse effect on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) according to a group of HBCU education deans and administrators. This group represented educator preparation programs that graduate more than 50 percent of all Black public school teachers. The group contends that the CAPE standards will negatively “impact the delivery of their educator programs.” Some concerns are increased admissions criteria, accountability issues beyond a program’s control, and the ‘for-profit’ teacher training programs (Hawkins, 2013)..

Teacher preparation programs are now challenged to provide more functional field experiences, requiring increased collaboration between k-12 school systems and institutions of higher education (NCATE, 2010). These collaborations must lead to more instructional responsibilities for teacher candidates prior to the prominent, one-term “student teaching course.” There is significant evidence that extensive field experiences will promote higher student achievement gains (Daniels, Patterson & Dunston, 2010;Teaching, 2030, 2014).

Several models have proven effective for clinically-based (NCATE, 2010). These models generally fall within three categories--Teacher Residency, Blended, and Professional Development Schools. Given the scenarios that CAPE standards will have for HBCUs, the ‘best fit’ is a true quandary.

Keywords

CAPE Standards, Clinical partnerships and practices, Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU)

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Oct 18th, 10:30 AM Oct 18th, 11:45 AM

Same Song, Different Choir

Room 211

The CAPE standards have led to more precise, outcomes based expectations. However, the standards may have an adverse effect on Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCU) according to a group of HBCU education deans and administrators. This group represented educator preparation programs that graduate more than 50 percent of all Black public school teachers. The group contends that the CAPE standards will negatively “impact the delivery of their educator programs.” Some concerns are increased admissions criteria, accountability issues beyond a program’s control, and the ‘for-profit’ teacher training programs (Hawkins, 2013)..

Teacher preparation programs are now challenged to provide more functional field experiences, requiring increased collaboration between k-12 school systems and institutions of higher education (NCATE, 2010). These collaborations must lead to more instructional responsibilities for teacher candidates prior to the prominent, one-term “student teaching course.” There is significant evidence that extensive field experiences will promote higher student achievement gains (Daniels, Patterson & Dunston, 2010;Teaching, 2030, 2014).

Several models have proven effective for clinically-based (NCATE, 2010). These models generally fall within three categories--Teacher Residency, Blended, and Professional Development Schools. Given the scenarios that CAPE standards will have for HBCUs, the ‘best fit’ is a true quandary.