2016 Conference Archive
What about LibQual for Our Vendors? Assessing Vendor Services
Type of Presentation
Individual paper/presentation
Type of Presentation
Poster Session (45 minutes)
Target Audience
Higher Education
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
Location
CGC Lobby
Relevance
N/A
Proposal
Database access is integral to libraries and connecting our users to these rich resources is paramount. In light of our stretched budgets and the mounting costs associated with subscription, we wonder if we should be expecting more out of our vendors. We need to shine a light on our vendors. For this poster, we plan to examine Lexis Academic and EBSCO and what they are doing well and what may need improvement.
Short Description
In light of our stretched budgets and the mounting costs associated with subscription, we wonder if we should be expecting more out of our vendors. For this poster, we plan to examine Lexis Academic and EBSCO and what they are doing well and what may need improvement.
Keywords
Resources, assessment, selection, instruction, collaboration, knowledge base
Publication Type and Release Option
Presentation (Open Access)
Recommended Citation
Devaney, Sheila and Joyner, Zanada, "What about LibQual for Our Vendors? Assessing Vendor Services" (2016). Georgia International Conference on Information Literacy. 59.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/gaintlit/2016/2016/59
What about LibQual for Our Vendors? Assessing Vendor Services
CGC Lobby
Database access is integral to libraries and connecting our users to these rich resources is paramount. In light of our stretched budgets and the mounting costs associated with subscription, we wonder if we should be expecting more out of our vendors. We need to shine a light on our vendors. For this poster, we plan to examine Lexis Academic and EBSCO and what they are doing well and what may need improvement.
