College of Graduate Studies: Theses & Dissertations

Term of Award

Spring 2026

Degree Name

Doctor of Education (Ed.D.)

Document Type and Release Option

Dissertation (restricted to Georgia Southern)

Copyright Statement / License for Reuse

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.

Department

Department of Curriculum, Foundations, and Reading

Committee Chair

Ming Fang He

Committee Member 1

William Schubert

Committee Member 2

Robert Lake

Committee Member 3

Peggy Shannon-Baker

Abstract

Teaching and belonging in educational spaces organized around expectations of normalcy carries a cost that rarely gets named. Schools reward composure, sameness, and control, shaping how professionalism is defined and who is recognized as competent. For educators whose ways of thinking, processing, and moving through the world do not align with these expectations, belonging must be negotiated rather than assumed. The purpose of this study is to examine how ableist expectations shape professional identity and experiences of belonging in education. Grounded in Critical Disability Studies (Davis, 1995; Linton, 1998; Siebers, 2008; Dolmage, 2017; Garland-Thomson, 2011; Price, 2011; McRuer, 2006; Kafer, 2013) and informed by DisCrit perspectives that examine how systems determine who is recognized, supported, and valued in educational spaces (Annamma, Connor, & Ferri, 2013, 2016), this study employs memoir as method (Pinar, 1975, 1994, 2012; Grumet, 1988; Miller, 2005; Britzman, 2003; hooks, 1994). Through narrative chapters, personal experiences as a neurodivergent learner and educator are examined to trace how expectations of professionalism, belonging, and competence are learned, performed, and reinforced over time. These narratives are paired with reflective analysis to position lived experience as a form of knowledge and critique (Couser, 2012; Rak, 2013; Johnson, 2005; Mooney, 2007). Six meanings emerged from this inquiry: normalcy is not neutral but socially constructed and institutionally reinforced; the identities of educators with learning differences must be affirmed beyond ableist standards that equate competence with the performance of normalcy; recognizing the hidden labor of performing normalcy reframes exhaustion as structural rather than personal and opens space to rebuild professional identity without self-erasure; inclusion does not guarantee belonging, and when belonging requires performance, unbelonging becomes a form of resistance; neurodivergent ways of thinking are strengths, not deficiencies, and a good teacher can exist because of those differences, not despite them; and memoir transforms personal memory into theoretical insight, evolving recursively as lived experience and Critical Disability Studies inform one another.

Research Data and Supplementary Material

No

Available for download on Wednesday, April 02, 2031

Share

COinS