Term of Award
Winter 2024
Degree Name
Master of Science in Kinesiology (M.S.)
Document Type and Release Option
Thesis (open access)
Copyright Statement / License for Reuse
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.
Department
Department of Health Sciences and Kinesiology
Committee Chair
Nicholas Siekirk
Committee Member 1
Jody Langdon
Committee Member 2
Li Li
Abstract
Isotonic hamstring exercises are employed to mitigate the risk of a future hamstring strain and after strain, incorporated into return-to-play protocols. However, research has negated leg dominance's influence on muscle recruitment and exercise form. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare muscle recruitment between the dominant (DOM) and non-dominant (nonDOM) during prone hamstring exercise (PHSE) variations. METHODS: Twenty trained participants aged 18 – 33 (M = 23 years, SD = 3 years) completed familiarization and experimental protocols > 72 hours apart. Participants underwent four PHSE variations that differed by load type (barbell vs. dumbbell), exercise strategy (bilateral vs. unilateral), and exercise tempos (fast vs. slow). Mean electromyography (mEMG) of the gluteus maximus (Gmax), biceps femoris (BF), vastus lateralis (VL), and gastrocnemius (GS) were recorded bilaterally, normalized to maximum voluntary contractions (MVC), and reported as a percentage (%MVC) for the dominant and non-dominant legs, as determined by the Waterloo Footed Questionnaire. Separated linear mixed models examined the eccentric (ECC) and concentric (CON) mEMG for 3-way interaction between side (DOM vs nonDOM), variation (barbell bilateral strategy vs. dumbbell unilateral strategy), and eccentric tempo (2-second fast vs. 4-second slow) while controlling for baseline isokinetic strength. RESULTS: No three-way nor 2-way interactions were detected (p > 0.122). Main effects of the side were detected in all recorded muscles (ps ps < 0.027). Conversely, the nonDOM’s BF EMG was greater than DOM (ps < 0.001). Main effects of tempo were limited to the GS and VL where fast tempo produced greater mEMG (p < 0.014). CONCLUSION: We observed biased recruitment in the nonDOM’s BF and the DOMs Gmax, VL, and GS across PHSE variations despite no differences in knee active range of motion or isokinetic, isometric strength assessment. Further investigations are warranted to decipher whether this recruitment bias is a compensatory motor strategy to adhere to task goals and whether this recruitment bias is observed with increased external exercise loads. Furthermore, whether this recruitment bias constitutes a risk for a hamstring strain is yet to be determined.
OCLC Number
1478262330
Catalog Permalink
https://galileo-georgiasouthern.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/permalink/01GALI_GASOUTH/1r4bu70/alma9916599550002950
Recommended Citation
Hughes, T., "The effects of external load type and eccentric tempo on hamstring electromyography during unilateral and bilateral prone hamstring exercise" (2024). Electronic Theses and Dissertations
Research Data and Supplementary Material
Yes