AMTP Proceedings 2020
Document Type
Conference Proceeding
Conference Track
Marketing Management/ Strategy/ Branding
Copyright
This work is archived and distributed under the repository's Standard Copyright and Reuse License (opens in new tab). End users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For all other uses, permission must be obtained from the copyright owners or their authorized agents.
Abstract
This qualitative research seeks to shed light on the manner in which marketing and corporate political activity (CPA) interface through senior-level managers acting as key informants. Relying on transcendental phenomenology (n = 41) and grounded theory (n = 402) methods, respectively, Study One uncovers a set of activities difficult to distinguish as either marketing or politics, i.e., legitimacy branding, with Study Two invalidated legitimacy branding as a traditional political strategy. Legitimacy branding’s key characteristics –1) branded reputations, 2) nonmarket targets, 3) for proactive control – position it as marketing-based CPA. While such strategy is generally consistent with previous findings, they follow a silo pattern spread across marketing, business, and sociological literature. These findings, instead, offer holistic evidence of branding strategies designed to control public policy. Legitimacy branding firm strategies to control nonmarkets extend place marketing conversations directly to the management of nonmarkets and marketing subsystems conversations to specific firm identity concepts.
DOI
10.20429/amtp.2020.35
Recommended Citation
Zeiss, Jessica, "Empirical Evidence of the Marketing and Corporate Political Activity Interface in Firm Strategy" (2020). AMTP Proceedings 2020. 35.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/amtp-proceedings_2020/35
Supplemental Reference List with DOIs
Included in
Law and Politics Commons, Legislation Commons, Marketing Commons
