Accountancy: Faculty Publications
Derivative accounting and financial reporting quality
Document Type
Article
Publication Date
3-1-2019
Publication Title
Advances in Accounting
DOI
10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.003
Abstract
The financial crisis of 2008 increased the call for standard setters and financial regulators to review the effectiveness of derivative regulation in improving financial reporting quality. Prior literature defines financial reporting quality as the extent to which financial statements provide information that is useful to investors and creditors in their investment decisions (Schipper, 2003; Schipper & Vincent, 2003). This review summarizes the empirical evidence regarding the effectiveness of derivative regulation in achieving its stated objective. Extant literature shows that although derivative regulations have improved information provided to investors, there is still room for improvement. Recommendations from this stream of literature suggest that the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) require managers to provide more complete, transparent, and forward-looking disclosures surrounding their derivative positions (Campbell, 2015; Franco-Wong, 2000). This review may be useful to standard setters, practitioners, and accounting academics by providing a synthesis of extant academic literature on the effectiveness of current derivative regulation. As the FASB and International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) continue to expand derivative accounting rules, this review may also be useful in identifying areas for future academic research.
Recommended Citation
Hairston, Stephanie A., Marcus R. Brooks.
2019.
"Derivative accounting and financial reporting quality."
Advances in Accounting, 44: 81-94.
doi: 10.1016/j.adiac.2018.10.003
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/account-facpubs/198
Copyright
Publisher Copyright: © 2018
Comments
Publisher Copyright: © 2018