Term of Award

Summer 2004

Degree Name

Master of Science

Document Type and Release Option

Thesis (restricted to Georgia Southern)


Department of Psychology

Committee Chair

John D. Murray

Committee Member 1

William D. McIntosh

Committee Member 2

Michael E. Nielsen


Science and religion are two common ways of acquiring knowledge. Despite their prevalence, these two belief systems are often in conflict. The current study sought to explain how people of normal intelligence are able to maintain contradictory belief systems. It is argued that certain types of religious individuals are able to maintain these two belief systems because they possess higher levels of cognitive complexity compared to other types of religious believers. The present study used Tripodi and Bieri's (1966) modified REP test of cognitive complexity (Kelly, 1955) to assess whether different types of religious believers differ in their levels of cognitive complexity. Because less rigid religious believers (non-orthodox, symbolic interpretations), by definition, possess contradictory belief systems (religion and science), it was hypothesized that they possess higher levels of cognitive complexity than more rigid religious believers (orthodox, literal interpreters). Results, however, did not support this idea. Possible implications are explored.

Files over 10MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "Save as..."