•  
  •  
 

Abstract

Earmarking has been both praised and denounced as a fi cal tool of state government, 1 but there appears to be little scholarly research to either support or refute the arguments put forth in the dedication controversy. This paper attempts to weigh the evidence both for and against special funding, and to suggest some long-run planning corrections which would serve as a remedy to some specific problems often encountered in t he earmarking process.

Dr. Simkin is an Associate Professor in the College of Business at the University of Hawaii.

Copyright

This work is archived and distributed under the repository's standard copyright and reuse license, available here. Under this license, end-users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For questions related to additional reuse of this work, please contact the copyright owner.

Share

COinS