Subjective Perspectives on Antarctic Wilderness: An Application of Integral Ecology

Faculty Mentor

Dr. John Peden

Location

Russell Union Room 2054

Type of Research

Completed

Session Format

Oral Presentation

College

College of Behavioral & Social Sciences

Department

School of Human Ecology

Abstract

Parties to the Antarctic Treaty have set Antarctica aside for peace, scientific research, and environmental protection. However, they have yet to take concrete actions to protect Antarctica’s wilderness values as agreed under the 1991 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Meanwhile, pristine areas that are free from human interference are declining as human activity escalates. This study examines perceptions of Antarctic wilderness through the lens of integral ecology. Data from 1,640 people and 16 study populations were extracted from four published studies. Content analysis was conducted to determine how subjective perspectives differ across populations and geographic regions. All study populations indicated higher levels of support for Antarctica as wilderness and a component of the climate system. Most populations also valued Antarctica as a science laboratory. Study populations showed lower levels of support for Antarctica as a tourist destination or mineral reserve. In Europe, support for Antarctica as a wilderness was higher among people with firsthand experience with Antarctica (tourists) than university students and local residents. In the US, support for Antarctica as a mineral reserve was higher among those without firsthand experience than those with firsthand experience. All populations consistently valued Antarctica highly for non-commercial, non-extractive and protective purposes, which is in line with the objectives of the Antarctic Treaty and the Protocol on Environmental Protection. However, tourists’ support for wilderness, climate, and tourism do not align with the environmental impacts of travel to Antarctica.

Program Description

.

Start Date

4-23-2026 3:00 PM

End Date

4-23-2026 3:15 PM

This document is currently not available here.

Share

COinS
 
Apr 23rd, 3:00 PM Apr 23rd, 3:15 PM

Subjective Perspectives on Antarctic Wilderness: An Application of Integral Ecology

Russell Union Room 2054

Parties to the Antarctic Treaty have set Antarctica aside for peace, scientific research, and environmental protection. However, they have yet to take concrete actions to protect Antarctica’s wilderness values as agreed under the 1991 Protocol on Environmental Protection to the Antarctic Treaty. Meanwhile, pristine areas that are free from human interference are declining as human activity escalates. This study examines perceptions of Antarctic wilderness through the lens of integral ecology. Data from 1,640 people and 16 study populations were extracted from four published studies. Content analysis was conducted to determine how subjective perspectives differ across populations and geographic regions. All study populations indicated higher levels of support for Antarctica as wilderness and a component of the climate system. Most populations also valued Antarctica as a science laboratory. Study populations showed lower levels of support for Antarctica as a tourist destination or mineral reserve. In Europe, support for Antarctica as a wilderness was higher among people with firsthand experience with Antarctica (tourists) than university students and local residents. In the US, support for Antarctica as a mineral reserve was higher among those without firsthand experience than those with firsthand experience. All populations consistently valued Antarctica highly for non-commercial, non-extractive and protective purposes, which is in line with the objectives of the Antarctic Treaty and the Protocol on Environmental Protection. However, tourists’ support for wilderness, climate, and tourism do not align with the environmental impacts of travel to Antarctica.