Location

Presentation- College of Arts and Humanities

Document Type and Release Option

Thesis Presentation (Restricted to Georgia Southern)

Faculty Mentor

Dr. William Eaton

Faculty Mentor Email

weaton@georgiasouthern.edu

Presentation Year

2021

Start Date

26-4-2021 12:00 AM

End Date

30-4-2021 12:00 AM

Keywords

Georgia Southern University, Honors Symposium, Presentation

Description

In 2020, the documentary on The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez was brought to the screens of people all across the world. The film demonstrated the issues of the child welfare system and how children are affected. The case discussed in the film in which an 8-year-old boy was murdered sparked a new discussion on the rights of children and their protection. The Gabriel Fernandez case exposes the multitude of failures across the system. During the trial, Gabriel’s mother and stepfather were convicted for murder without parole. However, as more details emerged about the ones tasked with protecting Gabriel, many critics pointed out that there were dozens of people who were responsible, both directly and indirectly, for Gabriel’s death. Despite the overwhelming amount of evidence that many failed Gabriel and broke the laws put in place to protect children, those have not yet been held accountable. This introduces the conversation regarding accountability, obligation, and child vs. parent rights. Immanuel Kant, a late 18th century philosopher, provided what the rights of a child and parent are how these rights are necessary to the parent-child relationship. Following an analysis of Kant’s definition of right and the parental roles that must accompany a child, this paper will seek to determine the difference between the rights of children versus the rights of parents, and how such differences contribute to who should be held accountable in the frequent instances of child abuse, neglect, and domestic violence.

Academic Unit

College of Arts and Humanities

Comments

This work is archived and distributed under the repository's standard copyright and reuse license, available here. Under this license, end-users may copy, store, and distribute this work without restriction. For questions related to additional reuse of this work, please contact the copyright owner.

Files over 10MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "Save as..."

Share

COinS
 
Apr 26th, 12:00 AM Apr 30th, 12:00 AM

Childhood, Moral Obligation, and the Law in The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez

Presentation- College of Arts and Humanities

In 2020, the documentary on The Trials of Gabriel Fernandez was brought to the screens of people all across the world. The film demonstrated the issues of the child welfare system and how children are affected. The case discussed in the film in which an 8-year-old boy was murdered sparked a new discussion on the rights of children and their protection. The Gabriel Fernandez case exposes the multitude of failures across the system. During the trial, Gabriel’s mother and stepfather were convicted for murder without parole. However, as more details emerged about the ones tasked with protecting Gabriel, many critics pointed out that there were dozens of people who were responsible, both directly and indirectly, for Gabriel’s death. Despite the overwhelming amount of evidence that many failed Gabriel and broke the laws put in place to protect children, those have not yet been held accountable. This introduces the conversation regarding accountability, obligation, and child vs. parent rights. Immanuel Kant, a late 18th century philosopher, provided what the rights of a child and parent are how these rights are necessary to the parent-child relationship. Following an analysis of Kant’s definition of right and the parental roles that must accompany a child, this paper will seek to determine the difference between the rights of children versus the rights of parents, and how such differences contribute to who should be held accountable in the frequent instances of child abuse, neglect, and domestic violence.