Proposal Title

Post Conference Assessment Data and Comments

Information

Numerical data based on: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Poor)

  1. 2009: n=136

    A.
    1. The conference helped participants share knowledge 4.48
    2. I made new contacts and opportunities for collaboration 4.05
    3. Conference as a professional development experience 4.27
    4. I experienced how SoTL can improve teaching and learning 4.14
    5. Concurrent sessions' topics were important and relevant 4.07
    6. Conference encouraged me to begin/continue doing SoTL 4.28
    7. Quality of the concurrent sessions 3.92
    8. Quality of the keynote addresses 3.53

    B.
    9. Abstract submission & review process (if applicable) 4.35
    10. Conference web site 4.23
    11. Online registration process 4.28
    12. Conference program booklet 4.49
    13. Conference facility 4.56
    14. On-site organization of the conference 4.54
    15. Quality of food & refreshments 3.84
    16. Hospitality at the conference 4.61

    17. Overall evaluation of the conference 4.3


    18. Do you plan on attending the 3rd SoTL Commons Conference on March 10-12, 2010?

    Yes: 60
    No: 5
    Undecided: 67
    No Response: 5

Publication Type and Release Option

Presentation (Open Access)

Share

COinS
 

Post Conference Assessment Data and Comments