Post Conference Assessment Data and Comments

Presenters

SoTL Commons Conference

Information

Numerical data based on: 5 (Excellent), 4 (Very Good), 3 (Good), 2 (Fair), 1 (Poor)

1. 2009: n=136

   A.
   1. The conference helped participants share knowledge 4.48
   2. I made new contacts and opportunities for collaboration 4.05
   3. Conference as a professional development experience 4.27
   4. I experienced how SoTL can improve teaching and learning 4.14
   5. Concurrent sessions' topics were important and relevant 4.07
   6. Conference encouraged me to begin/continue doing SoTL 4.28
   7. Quality of the concurrent sessions 3.92
   8. Quality of the keynote addresses 3.53
   
   B.
   9. Abstract submission & review process (if applicable) 4.35
   10. Conference web site 4.23
   11. Online registration process 4.28
   12. Conference program booklet 4.49
   13. Conference facility 4.56
   14. On-site organization of the conference 4.54
   15. Quality of food & refreshments 3.84
   16. Hospitality at the conference 4.61
   
   17. Overall evaluation of the conference 4.3

   
   18. Do you plan on attending the 3rd SoTL Commons Conference on March 10-12, 2010?

   Yes: 60
   No: 5
   Undecided: 67
   No Response: 5

Recommended Citation

SoTL Commons Conference, "Post Conference Assessment Data and Comments" (2009). SoTL Commons Conference. 5.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/sotlcommons/SoTL/2009/5