Thinking about Power and Schooling Through Educational Theorists
Titles of Presentations in a Panel
Discussants and Presenters
Discussant #1: William Schubert, Professor of Curriculum, U of Illinois at Chicago
Discussant #2: Min Yu, Wayne State University
Discussant #3: Christopher B. Crowley, Wayne State University
Discussant #4: Ming Fang He, Georgia Southern University
Discussant #5: Isabel Nuñez, Concordia University Chicago
Discussant #6: Michelle Bae-Dimitriadis, SUNY Buffalo State
Presenters:
Ming Fang He, Georgia Southern University
Saundra D. Echols, Georgia Southern University
Winona T. Hatcher, Georgia Southern University
Ellen M. Hotchkiss, Georgia Southern University
Gerald C. Nwachukwu, Georgia Southern University
Abdulrahman F. Alhawsali, Georgia Southern University
Rebecca J. Byrne, Georgia Southern University
Chanda R. Hardiman, Georgia Southern University
Tara L. Van Buskirk, Georgia Southern University
Emails of Discussants:
William Schubert, schubert@uic.edu
Min Yu, minyu@wayne.edu
Christopher B. Crowley, cbcrowley@wayne.edu
Ming Fang He, mfhe@georgiasouthern.edu
Isabel Nuñez, isabel.nunez@cuchicago.edu
Michelle Bae-Dimitriadis, baems@buffalostate.edu or suehbae@gmail.com
Emails of Presenters:
Ming Fang He, mfhe@georgiasouthern.edu or mingfhe88@gmail.com
Saundra D. Echols, se01813@georgiasouthern.edu or sdechols903@gmail.com
Winona T. Hatcher, wh02195@georgiasouthern.edu
Ellen M. Hotchkiss, eh03572@georgiasouthern.edu
Gerald C. Nwachukwu, gn00447@georgiasouthern.edu
Abdulrahman F. Alhawsali, aa06019@georgiasouthern.edu or Alhawsali1@gmail.com
Rebecca J. Byrne, rb0334@georgiasouthern.edu or rjobyrne@comcast.net
Chanda R. Hardiman, ch00663@georgiasouthern.edu or chanda_112@yahoo.com
Tara L. Van Buskirk, tv00612@georgiasouthern.edu or TaraVanBuskirk@gmail.com
Abstract
Multiethnic practitioner researchers explore issues of power and schooling in relation to curriculum studies in the South. We discuss how the articulation and examination of issues of power and schooling are illuminated in 20 key texts of prominent educational thinkers (e.g., Bell, 1992; Dewey, 1931; Foucault, 1977; Freire, 1970/1992, 1998; Giroux, 1998; Grande, 2004; hooks, 1994; Illich, 1972; Kozol, 1992, 1981/1993; Lee, 2012; Nussbaum, 2010; Palmer,1998; Saïd, 1994; Schubert, 2009; Takaki, 1993; Watkins, 2011; Whitehead, 1929/1957; Zinn, 1980/2003). We particularly explore how 20 educational thinkers cultivate critical consciousness through counternarratives to explore issues of power and schooling such as race, gender, class, power, and place to contest the official or metanarrative that often portrays disenfranchised individuals and groups as deficient and inferior. The counternarratives in 20 key texts help tell silenced and neglected stories of repressions, suppressions, and subjugations that challenge stereotypes of Southern women, Blacks, and other disenfranchised individuals and groups and encourage examination of the forces of slavery, racism, sexism, classism, religious repression, and other forms of oppression on the life curriculum in schools, neighborhoods, and communities in the South. There are six specific purposes to the session. One purpose is to understand multiple theories of power. A second purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of pedagogical practices. The third purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of institutions in contemporary schooling. The fourth purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of policies and contexts in contemporary schooling. The fifth purpose is to explore the contradictions and complexities of competing theories of power.
Presentation Description
In this interactive curriculum dialogue symposium, a group of multiethnic practitioner researchers in the Ed. D. in Curriculum Studies Program at Georgia Southern University explore issues of power and schooling in relation to curriculum studies in the South. We discuss how the articulation and examination of issues of power and schooling are illuminated in the 20 key texts of prominent educational thinkers (e.g., Bell, 1992; Foucault, 1977; Freire, 1970/1992; Kozol, 1992; Nussbaum, 2010; Palmer, 1998; Saïd, 1994; Schubert, 2009; Takaki, 1993; Watkins, 2011; Zinn, 1980/2003). We particularly explore how the 20 educational thinkers cultivate critical consciousness through counternarratives to explore issues of power and schooling such as race, gender, class, power, and place to contest the official or meta narrative that often portrays disenfranchised individuals and groups as deficient and inferior. The counternarratives in the 20 key texts help tell silenced and neglected stories of repressions, suppressions, and subjugations that challenge stereotypes of Southern women, Blacks, and other disenfranchised individuals and groups and encourage examination of the forces of slavery, racism, sexism, classism, religious repression, and other forms of oppression and suppression on the life and curriculum in schools, neighborhoods, and communities in the South.
Keywords
Power, Schooling, Curriculum studies in the South, Educational thinkers, Critical consciousness, Counternarratives, Race, Gender, Class, Power, Place, Forms of oppression, The life curriculum in schools, Neighborhoods, Communities in the South
Location
Talmadge
Publication Type and Release Option
Presentation (Open Access)
Recommended Citation
He, Ming Fang, "Thinking about Power and Schooling Through Educational Theorists" (2016). Curriculum Studies Summer Collaborative. 54.
https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/cssc/2016/2016/54
Thinking about Power and Schooling Through Educational Theorists
Talmadge
Multiethnic practitioner researchers explore issues of power and schooling in relation to curriculum studies in the South. We discuss how the articulation and examination of issues of power and schooling are illuminated in 20 key texts of prominent educational thinkers (e.g., Bell, 1992; Dewey, 1931; Foucault, 1977; Freire, 1970/1992, 1998; Giroux, 1998; Grande, 2004; hooks, 1994; Illich, 1972; Kozol, 1992, 1981/1993; Lee, 2012; Nussbaum, 2010; Palmer,1998; Saïd, 1994; Schubert, 2009; Takaki, 1993; Watkins, 2011; Whitehead, 1929/1957; Zinn, 1980/2003). We particularly explore how 20 educational thinkers cultivate critical consciousness through counternarratives to explore issues of power and schooling such as race, gender, class, power, and place to contest the official or metanarrative that often portrays disenfranchised individuals and groups as deficient and inferior. The counternarratives in 20 key texts help tell silenced and neglected stories of repressions, suppressions, and subjugations that challenge stereotypes of Southern women, Blacks, and other disenfranchised individuals and groups and encourage examination of the forces of slavery, racism, sexism, classism, religious repression, and other forms of oppression on the life curriculum in schools, neighborhoods, and communities in the South. There are six specific purposes to the session. One purpose is to understand multiple theories of power. A second purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of pedagogical practices. The third purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of institutions in contemporary schooling. The fourth purpose is to engage in power analyses and critiques of policies and contexts in contemporary schooling. The fifth purpose is to explore the contradictions and complexities of competing theories of power.